IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN THE PUNISHMENT OF CORRUPTION CRIMES IN INDONESIA
Main Article Content
Zufarnesia
Yasmira Mandasari Saragih
Indonesia is a rule of law country where one of the basic objectives of eradicating criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia is to restore state losses. However, the retributive justice paradigm which is the legal basis for eradicating criminal acts of corruption and punishing perpetrators of corruption is not relevant to the main goal of the law of eradicating corruption in Indonesia. What is actually important in the spirit of eradicating corruption is that returning state losses is only an additional penalty which can also be replaced by imprisonment. This article is intended to examine the concept of criminal punishment for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption that is relevant to be implemented in Indonesia in accordance with what is required by law by taking into account developments in the life of the nation and state today. The study focuses on deepening collaboration on the concept of restorative justice to maximize returns to state finances in punishing perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia. By using normative juridical research methods, this study concludes that the concept of restorative justice in punishing perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption can be implemented in the form of strengthening norms for returning state losses from being an additional crime to being a basic crime. To anticipate that the perpetrator will not be able to pay the losses, the concept of forced labor can be applied instead of imprisoning the perpetrator of a criminal act of corruption.
Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih, Teguh Prasetyo, Jawade Hafidz, Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) sebagai Penuntut Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi, 2018, https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/unifikasi/article/view/763, Sinta 3.
Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih, Problematika Gratifikasi Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, 2018, Jurnal Hukum Responsif, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&cluster=5512343284589834193
Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih, Muhammad Arif Sahlepi, Kewenangan Penyadapan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Trisakti, 2019, https://trijurnal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/hpph/article/view/5467
Budi Suharianto, RESTORATIF JUSTICE DALAM PEMIDANAAN KORPORASI PELAKU KORUPSI DEMI OPTIMALISASI PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA, Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasiona, Vol 5, No 3 (2016), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v5i3.153
PBB, United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/, Di Akses Pada 12 Desember 2023 Pukul 15.30 WIB.
Adami Chazawi. 2002. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 2. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Agus Rusianto. 2015. Tindak Pidana & Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi antara Asas, Teori, dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Kencana.
Aleksandar Fatic. 1995. Punishment and Restorative Crime Handling. USA: Avebury Ashagate Publishing Limited.
Andi Hamzah, 1985 Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia dari retribusi ke reformasi. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita. Djoko Prakoso. 1988. Hukum Penitensier di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Eva Achjani Zulfa. 2009. Keadilan Restoratif. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
UU No. 31/1999 Jo UU No. 20/2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
