CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIMES BASED ONARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Indonesian Criminal Law, Cybercrime, Criminal Liability, AI RegulationAbstract
The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has complex legal implications, particularly in the field of criminal law. Crimes committed using AI systems such as deepfakes, automated cyber attacks, algorithm-based fraud, and data manipulationraises fundamental questions about who should be held criminally responsible. This study aims to analyze the concept of criminal liability for AI-based crimes within the existing Indonesian criminal law framework and identify existing legal gaps (leemten in het recht). The research method used is normative juridical with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The results show that the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) have not been able to optimally address criminal liability for crimes mediated by autonomous AI systems. Comprehensive regulatory reform is needed, including the determination of new legal subjects, the implementation of adapted strict liability and vicarious liability doctrines, and the establishment of a specific legal framework related to AI. This study recommends the drafting of an Artificial Intelligence Bill that explicitly regulates aspects of criminal liability in the AI ecosystem.
Downloads
References
Buku:
Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti.
Caldwell, M., Andrews, J. T. A., Tanay, T., & Griffin, L. D. (2020). AI-enabled future crime. Crime Science, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-020-00123-8
Floridi, L., et al. (2018). AI4People An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni.
Roeslan Saleh. (1983). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Dua Pengertian Dasar dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-komentarnya, Politeia.
Schaffmeister, D., Keijzer, N., & Sutorius, E.P.H. (2011). Hukum Pidana (Terjemahan J.E. Sahetapy). Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Turner, J. (2019). Robot Rules: Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Artikel/Jurnal:
Aldin, A., Jumanudin, J., & Fahlevi, A. R. (2026). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Tindak Pidana Berbasis Artificial Intelligence. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 5(1), 6033-6042.
Dremliuga, R., Kuznetcov, P., & Mamychev, A. (2019). Criteria for recognition of AI as a legal person. Journal of Politics and Law, 12(3), 105-113.
Hallevy, G. (2010). The criminal liability of artificial intelligence entities from science fiction to legal social control. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 4(2), 171-201.
Hibatulloh, B. H. F. (2025). Upaya penegakan hukum terhadap AI (Artificial Intelligence) sebagai subjek hukum pidana dalam perspektif kriminologi. Tarunalaw: Journal of Law and Syariah, 3(01), 87-98.
Harahap, A., Rahmayanti, R., Tiono, R., & Pariyono, B. A. (2025). Analisis Diskresi Hakim dalam Mengintegrasikan Rekomendasi Penalaran Hukum Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) di Pengadilan Niaga. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 4(9), 734-745.
Linarelli, J., Salomon, M. E., & Sornarajah, M. (2018). The Misery of International Law: Confrontations with Injustice in the Global Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laia, Y. R. N., Rahmayanti, R., Tampubolon, S. S., Gea, A. S., & Nasution, S. H. (2025). Implementasi Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Scammer. JISPENDIORA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 603-613.
Prakasa, S. U. W., & Widiatedja, I. G. N. P. (2021). Urgensi pengaturan kecerdasan artifisial di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 15(3), 499-518.
Putri, N. P. M., Hartono, M. S., & Yudiawan, I. D. G. H. (2024). Analisis Reformulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pengguna Teknologi Deepfake Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Berbasis Artificial Intelligence. Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda, 5(2), 120-129.
Syaharani, N., Rahmayanti, R., Nurdiana, C., Saputra, D. D., & Harahap, R. N. F. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Remaja Perempuan dari Kekerasan Seksual via Media Sosial. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 5(2), 1036-1047.
Tegnan, H. (2016). Legal pluralism and land law in Indonesia. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 48(2), 198-216.
Wahyudi, A. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana siber: Perspektif hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(1), 52-73.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan:
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2022 Nomor 196.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2023 Nomor 1.
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689.
