PUBLIC SERVICE QUALITY AS AN INFORMAL INSTRUMENT OF POLITICAL EDUCATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL TRUST

Authors

  • Enjang Kusnadi STISIP Widyapuri Mandiri

Keywords:

Institutional Trusts, Political Education, Public Service Quality, Street-Level Bureaucracy.

Abstract

Abstract

Political education in Indonesia is often reduced to electoral participation, ignoring the crucial role of citizens' daily interactions with the bureaucracy. This study aims to analyze how the quality of administrative services transforms into an informal political education tool that affects the level of institutional trust at the local level. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach through a case study in Cimaja Village, Sukabumi Regency, data were collected using a rapid assessment technique consisting of observations and in-depth interviews with residents and village apparatus. The results show that responsive, equal, and transparent public services by street-level bureaucracy empirically function as a democratic "classroom". Fair administrative interactions can reduce administrative burdens, build awareness of citizenship rights, and reduce political cynicism among the public. Furthermore, the quality of basic services is proven to reduce this cynicism and build autonomous institutional trust that encourages citizens' active participation in village development. This study concludes that public administration and political science cannot be rigidly separated at the level of local governance, where public service performance is an effective political education instrument. As a practical implication, it is recommended that local democracy evaluations integrate basic public service satisfaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Sage Publications.

Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (4th ed.). Routledge.

Hardiyansyah. (2022). Kualitas pelayanan publik: Konsep, dimensi, indikator dan implementasinya. Gava Media.

Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808.

Kreps, S., & Darden, J. (2020). State capacity and compliance: Evaluating the role of public institutions in citizen behavior. Journal of Public Policy, 40(3), 450–472.

Letki, N. (2006). Investigating the roots of civic morality: Trust, social capital, and institutional performance. Political Behavior, 28(4), 305–325.

Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507.

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th Anniversary Expanded Edition). Russell Sage Foundation.

Marien, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 267–291.

Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245–274.

Meng, T., & Yang, X. (2014). Public service performance and political trust in local government. Public Management Review, 16(6), 849–870.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2005). What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1050–1078.

Newton, K. (2009). Social and political trust. Dalam R. J. Dalton & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (hlm. 342–361). Oxford University Press.

Tyler, T. R. (1998). Trust and democratic governance. Dalam V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance (hlm. 269–294). Russell Sage Foundation.

Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99.

Van Ryzin, G. G. (2015). Expectancy disconfirmation and citizen satisfaction with local government. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 330–340.

Wakhid, A. A. (2017). Reformasi pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 7(2), 105–114.

Review, 61(3), 330–340.

Wakhid, AA (2017). Public service reform in Indonesia. Scientific Journal of Public Administration, 7(2), 105–114.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-10

How to Cite

Enjang Kusnadi. (2026). PUBLIC SERVICE QUALITY AS AN INFORMAL INSTRUMENT OF POLITICAL EDUCATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL TRUST. Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy, 4(4), 1897–1902. Retrieved from https://jishup.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/374

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.