POSITION VIDEO RECORDINGS AND DIGITAL CONVERSATIONS AS EVIDENCE IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES
Keywords:
domestic violence, video recording, digital conversation, tools proof electronics, digital forensicsAbstract
Development technology information has bring change to system proof in case criminal , including case Domestic Violence (DV). Video recordings and digital conversations through application message electronic the more Lots used For documenting incident violence in general happens in space private and difficult proven through witness direct . Research This aim analyze position and power proof video recordings as well digital conversations in domestic violence cases reviewed from aspect authentication , integrity , validity acquisition , and its relevance with action the crime charged . Research use method law normative with approach legislation , conceptual , and cases . Legal materials analyzed in a way qualitative-prescriptive based on provision law proof , arrangement information electronics , as well as development doctrine and practice justice . Research results show that video recordings and digital conversations can used as tool evidence that has strength proof if fulfil condition authentication , integrity , validity acquisition , and relevance . Authentication required For ensure source and authenticity evidence , whereas integrity ensure proof No experience change or manipulation . Legitimacy acquisition related with procedure acquire and secure evidence , while relevance show connection proof with element action domestic violence crime . Power proof digital evidence is cumulative and increasing strong if supported tool proof others . Therefore that , is necessary strengthening digital forensics and standardizing the chain of custody in order to ensure reliability digital evidence in the judicial process criminal .
Downloads
References
Chamim, M., Widodo, K., Riyadi, S., Achyarsyah, P., & Faisal. (2025). The role of digital evidence in criminal law enforcement: Challenges of authentication and admissibility in court. Research Horizon.
Dickson, P., Manuputty, M., & Ginting, Y. P. (2025). Kekuatan pembuktian percakapan digital sebagai alat bukti yang tidak diatur dalam KUHAP. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains, 4(3).
Hasibuan, K., Nasrullah, Nurahman, D., Muzayyin, A., & Ismail, A. (2025). Status hukum konten digital sebagai alat bukti kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) di pengadilan agama. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(12).
Mustafa, C. (2024). Integritas chain of custody pada pemeriksaan bukti digital. JUDEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(1), 75–96.
Putra, A. B. (2026). The legal standing of deepfake digital evidence in criminal proceedings: Challenges of evidentiary integrity in the AI era. Fox Justi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Putra, G. R. A. (2026). Kedudukan bukti digital dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia: Rekonsepsi pengaturan dan penguatan chain of custody di era cyber-enabled crime. BULETIN ADALAH, 8(7).
Regar, F. A., Istiqomah, M., & Sulistio, F. (2025). The urgency of legal regulations relating to the authentication of evidence electronics in the Indonesian criminal justice system. International Journal of Educational Review, Law and Social Sciences, 5(5).
Samudra, A. H., Basu, S., & Perez, C. S. (2026). Digital challenge, analogue mind-set: Assessing Indonesia’s electronic criminal evidence framework. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 11(1).
Vanessa, & Firmansyah, H. (2025). Analysis of the validity of electronic evidence in criminal trial proceedings and the implementation of its admissibility (Judgment study). Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 20(4).
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Republik Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Republik Indonesia. (2025). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.







