LIABILITY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY UNDER LAW NO. 40 OF 2007

Authors

  • Dian Mandayani Universitas Alwashliyah
  • Ismed Batubara Universitas Muslim Nusantara Alwashliyah
  • Henry Johan Nainggolan Universitas Alwashliyah

Keywords:

Board of Directors, Limited Liability Company, Fiduciary Duty, Business Judgment Rule, Director Liability, Good Corporate Governance.

Abstract

The Board of Directors occupies a central position in the governance of a limited liability company (Perseroan Terbatas/PT), possessing the authority to manage and represent the company while simultaneously bearing legal responsibility for decisions and actions undertaken in the company's interests. This study aims to analyze the legal liability of directors under Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, particularly in relation to the principles of fiduciary duty and the Business Judgment Rule (BJR). The study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. Data were collected through a literature review of legislation, court decisions, legal doctrines, academic literature, and relevant scholarly journals, and were analyzed using normative-qualitative analysis. The findings demonstrate that directors' liability is inseparable from their managerial authority and fiduciary position. Under Articles 92 through 104 of Law Number 40 of 2007, particularly Article 97, directors may incur personal liability for company losses when proven to have acted negligently, unlawfully, or in violation of their fiduciary obligations. Such liability may arise in civil, administrative, or criminal forms depending on the nature of the violation. At the same time, the BJR provides legal protection for directors who make business decisions in good faith, with due care, based on adequate information, and within the scope of their authority. However, the study identifies continuing legal uncertainty because the parameters for distinguishing legitimate business risk from negligence, bad faith, abuse of authority, or breach of fiduciary duty remain insufficiently clear and comprehensive. Therefore, strengthening the regulation and interpretation of the BJR, together with the reinforcement of Good Corporate Governance principles, is necessary to establish a balanced framework between directors' managerial discretion, corporate accountability, stakeholder protection, and legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Disemadi, H. S., Yusro, M. A., & Shaleh, A. I. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Direksi melalui Business Judgment Rule. Jurnal Jurisprudence.

Irawan, C. N., Pujiyono, & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2022). Implementasi Business Judgment Rule dalam Sistem Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Legal and Social Studies.

Isfardiyana, S. H. (2015). Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas dalam Perspektif Fiduciary Duty. Jurnal Hukum.

Joharsah, J. (2024). Development of company establishment arrangements limited in Indonesia. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v5i02.647

Khameswary, I. K. (2019). Good Corporate Governance dan Direktur Independen. Gema Keadilan.

Masrurah, B. O. (2019). Good Faith dan Business Judgment Rule dalam Hukum Perseroan Indonesia dan Malaysia. JISIP.

Panggabean, L. A., Ginting, B., & Sukarja, D. (2023). Rangkap Jabatan Direksi dan Komisaris dalam Perspektif Good Corporate Governance. Recht Studiosum Law Review.

Panjaitan, R., Anggusti, M., & Nababan, R. (2021). Business Judgment Rule terhadap Kebijakan Direksi yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Perseroan. Patik.

Pramagitha, P. A., & Sukranatha, A. A. K. (2019). Business Judgment Rule sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum bagi Direksi BUMN. Kertha Semaya.

Prasetyo, D. D. E., As Syadili, M. B. S. R., & Yulianingsih. (2023). Business Judgment Rule sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum bagi Direksi dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Bisnis. Jurnal Hukum.

Putra, M. R. (2021). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas. Lex Renaissance.

Raffles. (2020). Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Direksi dalam Perseroan Terbatas. Undang: Jurnal Hukum.

Ramadhan, B. (2022). Ultra Vires dan Tanggung Jawab Direksi dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum.

Rissy, Y. Y. W. (2020). Business Judgment Rule: Indonesia, Inggris dan Kanada. Mimbar Hukum.

Rokhim, A. (2020). Ultra Vires dalam Tindakan Direksi Perseroan Terbatas. Negara Hukum.

Sari, F. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Direksi atas Personal Guarantee dan Kerugian Perseroan. Jurnal Hukum.

Sedana, M. W. A., & Sarjana, I. M. (2023). Business Judgment Rule dan Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Perseroan Terbatas. Kertha Desa.

Silalahi, Y. Y., & Andryawan. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Anggaran Dasar Perseroan Terbatas yang Tidak Sesuai dengan Hukum Positif. Jurnal Serina Sosial Humaniora, 1(1), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.24912/jssh.v1i1.24563

Supriatna, A., & Ermond, B. (2019). Direktur Independen dan Good Corporate Governance. Jurnal Yuridis.

Wauda, J. B. (2019). Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas. Lex Privatum.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

Dian Mandayani, Ismed Batubara, & Henry Johan Nainggolan. (2025). LIABILITY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY UNDER LAW NO. 40 OF 2007. Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy, 3(1), 2106–2111. Retrieved from https://jishup.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/402

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.