JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EMBEZZLEMENT INVESTIGATIONS BY INDONESIAN NATIONAL POLICE INVESTIGATORS (A STUDY AT POLRESTA BARELANG, BATAM)

Abstract

Embezzlement is a frequently occurring crime against property that requires an effective investigation process to ensure legal certainty, justice, and legal utility. This study aims to analyze the legal framework, implementation, obstacles, and solutions concerning the investigation of embezzlement cases at Polresta Barelang, Batam. This study uses several theories as analytical tools, together with a normative statutory approach and a sociological approach to empirical legal research. Interviews with investigators at Polresta Barelang, Batam, provide the primary data, while a literature review of legislation relating to embezzlement provides the secondary data. All data are analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that embezzlement investigations at Polresta Barelang, Batam, have generally been conducted in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police, and police regulations on criminal investigation management. Nevertheless, investigation effectiveness remains less than optimal because of limited evidence, uncooperative witnesses, difficulties in securing suspects' attendance, and delays in complying with public prosecutors' instructions, all of which affect case resolution. Embezzlement investigations conducted by Indonesian National Police investigators at Polresta Barelang, Batam, have been reasonably effective but have not yet reached an optimal level. Improving their effectiveness requires stronger investigator competence, better use of investigative facilities and infrastructure, improved coordination with the prosecutor's office and relevant agencies, and the use of information technology to support professional and expeditious investigations that provide legal certainty and justice for the public.