AN EVALUATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF ADEQUACY IN INDONESIA AND THE UNITED STATES RECIPROCAL TRADE AGREEMENT
Keywords:
effectiveness, workshop, SBNP, public administration, navigation safety, Bitung Navigation DistrictAbstract
International trade today is no longer limited to the pricing of physical commodities; it has shifted toward the exchange of data, digital services, and high-tech investments. In this dynamic, the Adequacy Principle emerges as a key instrument. Article 56 of Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP) stipulates that cross-border data transfers are only permitted if the destination country has: (1) an equivalent or higher level of PDP, or (2) adequate and legally binding PDP measures, or (3) the consent of the data subject. To date, the Government Regulation—which is intended to establish the aforementioned equivalence criteria as a derivative of Article 56 has not yet been issued. In Article 3.2 Agreement Between The United States Of America And The Republic Of Indonesia On Reciprocal regarding Trade Data Transfers The principle of adequacy in U.S.-Indonesia trade relations remains asymmetrical. The United States tends to use adequacy as a leverage tool for global standardization, while Indonesia is still in a transitional phase of aligning domestic regulations (such as the PDP Law) to gain international recognition. Major Obstacles to Achieving a Mutually Beneficial Adequacy Status in U.S. and Indonesia Trade Relations include Differences in Cross-Border Data Protection Paradigms, Differences in Cross Border Data Protection Paradigms, Misalignment of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Enforcement Standards, and Regulatory Inconsistencies and Legal Uncertainty in Indonesia
Downloads
References
Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (13th ed.). Kogan Page.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (4th ed.). Routledge.
Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Laut, Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2021). Laporan kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Laut tahun 2021. Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia.
Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Manajemen pelayanan publik: Peduli, inklusif, dan kolaboratif. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Henry, N. (2015). Public administration and public affairs (13th ed.). Routledge.
International Maritime Organization. (1973/1978). International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78). International Maritime Organization.
Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia Nomor PM 2 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 19 Tahun 2022 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Distrik Navigasi. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2024 Nomor 40.
Mahsun, M. (2016). Pengukuran kinerja sektor publik (Ed. 1, Cet. 6). BPFE.
Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi sektor publik. Andi.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy. Scott, Foresman.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 tentang Pelayaran. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 Nomor 64; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4849.
Steers, R. M. (1985). Efektivitas organisasi. Erlangga.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill.
United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. United Nations.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
