AN EVALUATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF ADEQUACY IN THE U.S. AND INDONESIA RECIPROCAL TRADE AGREEMENT

Authors

  • Abdul Azis Ali Ramdlani Universitas Pembangunan Pancabudi
  • Rahmayanti Universitas Pembangunan Pancabudi

Keywords:

The Principle of Adequacy, Trade Agreements, United States-Indonesia

Abstract

International trade today is no longer limited to the pricing of physical commodities; it has shifted toward the exchange of data, digital services, and high-tech investments. In this dynamic, the Adequacy Principle emerges as a key instrument. Article 56 of Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP) stipulates that cross-border data transfers are only permitted if the destination country has: (1) an equivalent or higher level of PDP, or (2) adequate and legally binding PDP measures, or (3) the consent of the data subject. To date, the Government Regulation—which is intended to establish the aforementioned equivalence criteria as a derivative of Article 56 has not yet been issued. In Article 3.2 Agreement Between The United States Of America And The Republic Of Indonesia On Reciprocal regarding Trade Data Transfers The principle of adequacy in U.S.-Indonesia trade relations remains asymmetrical. The United States tends to use adequacy as a leverage tool for global standardization, while Indonesia is still in a transitional phase of aligning domestic regulations (such as the PDP Law) to gain international recognition. Major Obstacles to Achieving a Mutually Beneficial Adequacy Status in U.S. and Indonesia Trade Relations include Differences in Cross-Border Data Protection Paradigms, Differences in Cross Border Data Protection Paradigms, Misalignment of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Enforcement Standards, and Regulatory Inconsistencies and Legal Uncertainty in Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Huala Adolf. Dasar-dasar Hukum Kontrak Internasional. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.2008.

Putra, I. B. W. Aspek-aspek hukum perdata internasional dalam transaksi bisnis internasional. Bandung: PT.Rafika Aditama.2008.

Martwenty, I. M. Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) dalam perjanjian-perjanjian World Trade Organization (WTO): Pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. pn-boyolali.go.id. https://pn- boyolali.go.id/id/2023/03/13/special-and-differential-treatment-sdt-dalam-perjanjian-perjanjian- world-trade-organization-wto-pendekatan-peraturan-perundang-undangan/13Maret 2023.

Rusydiana, A. S. Perdagangan Internasional:Komparasi Teori Ekonomi Modern dengan Perspektif Islam. Ekuilbrium.2011.

Salman Nashih Amiin, Wirdyaningsih, Penerapan Prinsip-prinsip Perdagangan Internasional (Word Trade

Organization) dalam Tinjauan Maqashid Syari’ah,Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 3142 – 3151 P-ISSN 2620-295 E-ISSN 2747-0490DOI: 1047467/elmal.v6i9.8571. Vol.6 No 9.2025.

Setiawati, R. I. Buku Ajar Bisnis dan Perdagangan Internasional. Surabaya: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur.2021.

Sinta Sirait, Legalitas Lokalisasi Data dalam Era Perdagangan Digital, Jurnal Hukum & Pasar Modal, Vol. 9, 2021.

United States Trade Representative (USTR),Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property Rights.2023.

Simon Butt, The Economic Constitution of Indonesia: Law and Policy, Oxford University Press, 2020.

Appau, A., Drope, J., Labonté, R., Stoklosa, M., & Lencucha, R. Disentangling Regional Trade Agreements, Trade Flows and Tobacco Affordability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Globalization and Health, 13, Article No. 81. 2017

Cox, M. Power shifts, economic change and the decline of the West?. International Relations, 32(2), 155– 173.https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818772208.2018.

Guangying Xie, Lun Li. High-Standard Regional Free Trade Agreements: Features, Directions and Their Practical Paths to Promote Trade. Open Journal of Business and Management . Vol.13 No.1, January 2025.

Ria, W. R. Perdagangan bebas internasional dalam perspektif hukum ekonomi Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 108–122.2020.

UNCTAD.Global trade update. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.https://unctad.org/system/files/official- document/ditcinf2021d2_en.pdf.2021.

https: //www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pakar-soroti-3-implikasi-hukum-krusial-dalamperjanjian- perdagangan-indonesia-as-lt69a084473c3b2/?page=2, diakses pada tanggal 10 April 2026.

Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribad

Agreement Between The United States Of America And The Republic Of Indonesia

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994)

Downloads

Published

2026-05-06

How to Cite

Abdul Azis Ali Ramdlani, & Rahmayanti. (2026). AN EVALUATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF ADEQUACY IN THE U.S. AND INDONESIA RECIPROCAL TRADE AGREEMENT. Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy, 4(2), 498–503. Retrieved from https://jishup.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/219

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>