LEGAL RECONSTRUCTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION BASED ON DIGITAL JUSTICE TOWARDS PLATFORM ECONOMIC INEQUALITY IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Muhibuddin Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Zulkifli Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Teuku Yudi Afrizal Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Nasrianti Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Sofyan Jafar Universitas Malikussaleh

Keywords:

Intellectual Property Rights, Digital Justice, Platform Economy, Legal Reconstruction, Economic Inequality.

Abstract

Indonesia’s digital economy exceeded USD 82 billion in transaction value in 2023 and is projected to become the largest digital market in Southeast Asia by 2030. Despite this rapid growth, the expansion of platform-based digital markets has generated significant economic inequality between digital platforms and intellectual property rights (IPR) holders, particularly local creators and small digital enterprises. This study analyzes the legal reconstruction of intellectual property protection based on the principle of digital justice in addressing platform economic inequality in Indonesia. Employing a normative juridical method, the research applies statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The study finds that Indonesia’s existing IPR framework remains largely conventional and has not adequately responded to challenges arising from algorithmic control, data monopolization, unequal royalty distribution, and the dominance of digital platforms within the digital economy ecosystem. Furthermore, the lack of algorithmic transparency and limited legal accountability of digital platforms contribute to structural imbalances in the distribution of digital economic benefits. This study proposes a legal reconstruction model through strengthening platform accountability, reforming digital royalty mechanisms, enhancing protection of creators’ digital rights, and harmonizing IPR regulations with digital economy and data protection laws. The study concludes that intellectual property protection in the digital era should not solely emphasize legal certainty, but must also ensure distributive digital justice and equitable economic participation in Indonesia’s platform economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Commission. (2023). Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act Framework. European Union Publications.

Google, Temasek, & Bain & Company. (2023). e-Conomy SEA 2023 Report. https://economysea.withgoogle.com/

Heeks, R. (2022). Digital inequality and adverse digital incorporation. Development Informatics Working Paper Series, University of Manchester.

Kusady, D. A. (2025). Application of essential facilities doctrine to data and algorithms in digital platforms. Journal of Law, Politics and Humanities, 4(2), 112–128.

Lee, L. (2024). Examining the legal status of digital assets as property: A comparative analysis of jurisdictional approaches. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.15391

Manurung, O. P. (2025). Protecting intellectual property rights in the digital revolution: Ministry of Law’s role reviewed. Customary Law Journal, 2(2), 45–59.

Nainggolan, B., et al. (2025). Legal protection of intellectual property for digital works by utilizing emerging technologies. Jurnal Hukum, 18(1), 77–93.

Siagian, E. B. (2025). Legal reform of copyright in the digital economy era. Modern Science Journal, 5(1), 88–104.

Taylor, L. (2023). Data justice and digital rights in platform economies. Oxford University Press.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2023). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-28

How to Cite

Muhibuddin, Zulkifli, Teuku Yudi Afrizal, Nasrianti, & Sofyan Jafar. (2025). LEGAL RECONSTRUCTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION BASED ON DIGITAL JUSTICE TOWARDS PLATFORM ECONOMIC INEQUALITY IN INDONESIA. Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy, 3(3), 676–683. Retrieved from https://jishup.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/236

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)