IMPLEMENTATION OF NARCOTICS POLICY IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE TOMOHON POLICE RESORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59733/jishup.v4i2.250Keywords:
Policy Implementation, Narcotics, Personnel, Budget, Prevention, Tomohon PoliceAbstract
This study aims to describe, analyze, and explain the implementation of drug abuse policies in the Narcotics Criminal Investigation Unit of the Tomohon Police Resort Jurisdiction based on Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The focus of the study covers three main indicators: (a) the adequacy and qualifications of Narcotics Unit personnel, (b) the adequacy and efficiency of operational budget allocation, and (c) the coverage and effectiveness of community-based prevention programs. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. Research informants consist of the Head of the Narcotics Unit, members of the Narcotics Unit, and community leaders of Tomohon City. Data analysis uses the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, with data validity checks through source and technique triangulation. The research findings indicate that the implementation of narcotics policy at the Tomohon Police Department still faces various challenges. First, from a personnel perspective, there is a gap between ideal and actual needs, with only about 69 percent of personnel being met. Furthermore, there is uneven distribution of specialized training certification due to limited Education and Training (Dikbang) and Latnis (National Training and Development) quotas. Second, from a budget perspective, the allocation for outreach programs is only about 10-15 percent, without any real-world needs analysis support. There is no efficiency measurement mechanism, and there is still a reliance on the National Narcotics Agency (BNNP) for in-depth forensic analysis. Third, from a prevention program perspective, coverage remains limited, with the Drug-Free Village program limited to only one sub-district. Outreach methods are dominated by one-way, less interactive lectures, and there is no systematic rehabilitation referral mechanism. This study recommends additional personnel, expansion of prevention programs, development of digital-based outreach methods, and an increase in the budget allocated for preventive activities.
Downloads
References
Bastian, I. (2019). Akuntansi sektor publik di Indonesia. BPFE.
Damanhuri, D., & Tripadmi, T. (2015). Pencegahan penyalahgunaan narkotika berbasis masyarakat. Penerbit Kencana.
Dunn, W. N. (2017). Pengantar analisis kebijakan publik (Edisi Kedua). Gadjah Mada University Press.
Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Fauzi, A., & Ulfah, M. (2021). Analisis koordinasi antara Polri dan BNN dalam penanggulangan peredaran gelap narkotika di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 32(1), 45–62.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 17(4), 525–548.
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and in practice. Sage Publications.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hutapea, S. P., Kairupan, S. B., & Siwij, D. S. R. (2025). Implementasi Kebijakan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah Di Badan Keuangan Dan Aset Daerah Kota Bitung. J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 4(4), 2353–2361. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i4.10366
Kairupan, S. B. (2013). Kebijakan publik. Wineka Media.
Mahmudi. (2019). Manajemen kinerja sektor publik (Edisi Ketiga). UPP STIM YKPN.
Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi sektor publik. Penerbit Andi.
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2011). Human resource management (13th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
O'Toole, L. J., Jr. (2004). The theory-practice issue in policy implementation research. Public Administration, 82(2), 309–329.
Saiful, M. (2018). Koordinasi antar lembaga dalam pencegahan dan pemberantasan penyalahgunaan narkotika (P4GN) di Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FISIP Unsyiah, 3(1), 1–12.
Sahroni. (2026). Sinergitas BNN, kepolisian, dan kejaksaan dalam pemberantasan narkotika. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 7(1), 15–32.
Setyawan, D., & Santoso, B. (2022). Analisis kapasitas kelembagaan Satuan Narkoba Polres dalam penanganan tindak pidana narkotika: Studi di Polres Malang Kota. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.64532
Tanggol, F. D. (2015). The challenges of law enforcement in the Philippines' war on drugs: Lessons for Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 12(3), 345–367.
Teuku, M. (2020). Rehabilitasi korban penyalahgunaan narkotika. Penerbit Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Tumbel, G. H. (2023). Metode penelitian administrasi. Tangguh Denara Jaya.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488.
Weiss, C. H. (2018). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Widodo, J. (2001). Good governance: Telaah akademik konsep dan aplikasinya di Indonesia. Gava Media.
Winters, M. S., & Rasul, A. (2015). Decentralization and local service delivery: A framework and review. Journal of Development Studies, 51(8), 947–963.
World Bank. (2003). Indonesia: Beyond macro-stability – A framework for growth and poverty reduction. The World Bank.
