RECONSTRUCTION OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE REGIONAL SUPERVISORY COUNCIL IN ENFORCING THE LAW ON VIOLATIONS OF THE NOTARIAL OFFICE TO ENSURE LEGAL CERTAINTY AND ENHANCE NOTARIAL PROFESSIONALISM ( A STUDY IN BATAM CITY )
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22121691Keywords:
Law Enforcement, Legal Certainty, Notarial Office, Reconstruction of Authority, Regional Supervisory Council.Abstract
This research is motivated by the suboptimal authority of the Regional Supervisory Council (Regional Supervisory Council/MPD) in enforcing the law against violations of the notarial office, which affects legal certainty and the professionalism of notaries. The legal framework governing notarial supervision is regulated under Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary and Regulation of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights Number 15 of 2020 concerning Procedures for Examination by the Notary Supervisory Council. In practice, the MPD still faces limitations in authority, institutional coordination, and supervisory effectiveness. This study aims to analyze the legal framework, implementation, obstacles, and reconstruction of the MPD's authority in law enforcement against violations of the notarial office in Batam City.This research employs the theories of the rule of law, authority, legal certainty, and law enforcement. It uses an empirical legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and sociological approaches. Data were collected through library research and interviews and were analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the existing legal framework governing the MPD's authority has not fully supported effective law enforcement. Although supervision in Batam City has been implemented, it remains constrained by limited authority, weak institutional coordination, and ineffective follow-up on examination results. The reconstruction of the MPD's authority is therefore necessary through regulatory reform, stronger institutional coordination, capacity building for supervisors, and the utilization of technology in the supervisory system. The study concludes that reconstructing the MPD's authority is essential to strengthen law enforcement against violations of the notarial office, thus enhancing legal certainty and notarial professionalism. It is recommended that the government improve the existing regulatory framework and strengthen institutional and supervisory mechanisms to enhance the effectiveness of the MPD's functions.
Downloads
References
A. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
1. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
2. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek).
3. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
4. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
5. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
6. Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.
7. Undang-Undang Nomor 61 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2008 tentang Kementerian Negara.
B. Peraturan Menteri Hukum
1. Peraturan Menteri Hukum Nomor 17 Tahun 2025 tentang Formasi Jabatan Notaris dan Penentuan Kategori Daerah. (Database Peraturan | JDIH BPK
2. Peraturan Menteri Hukum Nomor 22 Tahun 2025 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pengangkatan, Cuti, Pindah Wilayah, Pemberhentian, dan Perpanjangan Masa Jabatan Notaris.
3. Peraturan Menteri Hukum Nomor 24 Tahun 2025 tentang Penetapan, Pembinaan, dan Pengawasan Organisasi Notaris.
4. Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Tata Cara Pemeriksaan Majelis Pengawas terhadap Notaris.
5. Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang Susunan Organisasi dan Tata Kerja, Tata Cara Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian, serta Anggaran Majelis Pengawas Notaris.
C. Keputusan Menteri Hukum
1. Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia tentang Pengangkatan Anggota Majelis Pengawas Pusat Notaris.
2. Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia tentang Pengangkatan Anggota Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris.
3. Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia tentang Pengangkatan Anggota Majelis Pengawas Daerah Notaris Provinsi Kepulauan Riau.
D. Jurnal
1. Habib Adjie. “Pengawasan Jabatan Notaris dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Notariil.
2. Mulyoto. “Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris dalam Penegakan Hukum Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal RechtsVinding.]
3. Yuliandri. “Kepastian Hukum dalam Pengawasan Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia.
4. Jurnal Acta Comitas (2020–2025) mengenai pengawasan notaris.
5. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan (2020–2025) mengenai
tanggung jawab dan pengawasan notaris.
6. Jurnal Media Iuris (2020–2025) mengenai hukum kenotariatan.
7. Jurnal Jurnal Notariil (2020–2025) mengenai pelaksanaan jabatan notaris.
8. Jurnal De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-undangan (2020–2025).
E. Internet
1. Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia.
2. Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum Nasional (JDIHN).
3. JDIH Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia.
4. Direktorat Jenderal Administrasi Hukum Umum (AHU).
5. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (Direktori Putusan).
6. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
7. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional (BPHN).
Referensi internet yang digunakan:
Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia
Direktorat Jenderal Administrasi Hukum Umum (AHU)
JDIH Kementerian Hukum
JDIHN
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
