LEGAL ANALYSIS OF IMMIGRATION MEASURES FOR FALSE INFORMATION AT CITRA TRITUNAS PORT

Authors

  • Tomi Farta Wijaya Universitas Batam
  • Erniyanti Universitas Batam
  • Soerya Respationo Universitas Batam
  • Ramlan Universitas Batam
  • Siti Nurkhotijah Universitas Batam

Keywords:

Citra Tritunas Port, Immigration Action, Immigration Inspection, Indonesian Citizens, Misrepresentation

Abstract

The increasing number of Indonesian citizens (WNI) departing the country by providing false information (misrepresentation) has become a challenge in the implementation of immigration supervision, particularly in preventing trafficking in persons (TIP) and the non-procedural placement of Indonesian migrant workers (PMI). This study analyzes the legal regulation of immigration measures against Indonesian citizens who provide false statements, the implementation of optimized immigration measures at Citra Tritunas International Port, Batam, and the obstacles and solutions encountered. The study employs empirical legal research using statutory, conceptual, case, and sociological approaches. Data were obtained through literature review, documentation, observation, and semi-structured interviews with officials and immigration inspection officers at the Batam Class I Special TPI Immigration Office and were analyzed qualitatively. The findings show that the legal framework is based on Law No. 6 of 2011 on Immigration as amended by Law No. 63 of 2024, but does not specifically regulate misrepresentation by Indonesian citizens at the departure stage. Implementation has been optimized through risk profiling, behavioral analysis, secondary inspection, the Immigration Management Information System (SIMKIM), and inter-agency coordination. Key obstacles include limited operational regulation, human resources, inspection facilities, and increasingly adaptive transnational crime. The proposed solutions are stronger technical regulations, improved officer competence, modernized inspection technology, and integrated inter-agency data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Manan. (2020). Aspek-Aspek Pengubah Hukum. Kencana.

Abdul Khakim. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Achmad Ali. (2021). Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan. Kencana.

Achmad Ali, & Wiwie Heryani. (2022). Menjelajahi Kajian Empiris terhadap Hukum. Kencana.

Amiruddin, & Zainal Asikin. (2021). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Bambang Sunggono. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Bernard L. Tanya et al. (2021). Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Genta Publishing.

Burhan Bungin. (2021). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Kencana.

Dinda Mayang et al. (2021). Strategi Pengawasan Keimigrasian serta Peran Hukum Keimigrasian dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Kedaulatan Negara di Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Riset.

Erniyanti, & Daniel Ferdinan Purba. (2024). Penataan Penegakan Hukum Maritim Menuju Indonesia Maju. Gita Lentera.

Esmi Warassih. (2021). Pranata Hukum: Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis. Suryandaru Utama.

Farhana. (2019). Aspek Hukum Perdagangan Orang di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

FX. Adji Samekto. (2022). Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah dan Teori. Setara Press.

FX. Adji Samekto. (2022). Hukum Progresif dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Thafa Media.

H. Hendrawan et al. (2022). Peran dan Pengawasan Keimigrasian dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Kedaulatan Negara. JIIP.

Ishaq. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi. Alfabeta.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. (2020). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Rajawali Pers.

Law No. 6 of 2011 on Immigration.

Law No. 18 of 2017 on the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers.

Law No. 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of the Criminal Act of Trafficking in Persons.

Law No. 63 of 2024 on the Third Amendment to Law No. 6 of 2011 on Immigration.

M. Iman Santoso. (2020). Hukum Keimigrasian Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

M. Iman Santoso. (2021). Perspektif Imigrasi dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Ketahanan Nasional. UI Press.

Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, & Johnny Saldaña. (2020). Analisis Data Kualitatif. UI Press.

Mukti Fajar ND, & Yulianto Achmad. (2021). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.

Pan Mohamad Faiz. (2019). Teori Keadilan John Rawls. Jurnal Konstitusi.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2021). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Ridwan HR. (2022). Hukum Administrasi Negara. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Ramlan et al. (2024). Juridical Analysis of the Authority of the Marine and Coast Guard Base in Carrying Out Its Duties (Research Study at Tanjung Uban Class II PLP Base). International Journal of Law and Society, 1(4).

Romli Atmasasmita. (2021). Rekonstruksi Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Mandar Maju.

Satjipto Rahardjo. (2020). Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Genta Publishing.

Satjipto Rahardjo. (2021). Hukum dan Perilaku: Hidup Baik adalah Dasar Hukum yang Baik. Kompas.

Satjipto Rahardjo. (2021). Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Satjipto Rahardjo. (2021). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Kompas.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2019). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. UI Press.

Soerjono Soekanto, & Sri Mamudji. (2020). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2020). Penemuan Hukum. Liberty.

Sudjito. (2022). Hukum Progresif: Dari Teori ke Praktik. Setara Press.

Teguh Prasetyo. (2021). Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum. Nusa Media.

Teguh Prasetyo, & Abdul Halim Barkatullah. (2021). Ilmu Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum. Pustaka Pelajar.

Teguh Sulistia, & Aria Zurnetti. (2021). Hukum Pidana: Horizon Baru Pasca Reformasi. RajaGrafindo Persada.

W. Silalahi. (2025). Fenomena Migrasi Ilegal dalam Perspektif Hukum Keimigrasian. Jurnal Nusantara.

Zainuddin Ali. (2022). Sosiologi Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

BP3MI Kepulauan Riau & Polresta Barelang. (2026, April). 78 calon pekerja migran Indonesia nonprosedural gagal berangkat ke Malaysia. https://kp2mi.go.id/berita-detail/78-calon-pekerja-migran-indonesia-nonprosedural-gagal-berangkat-ke-malaysia-bp3mi-kepri-dan-polresta-barelang-bertindak

Polresta Barelang. (2026, April 20). Pengungkapan kasus PMI non-prosedural: Polresta Barelang selamatkan puluhan calon pekerja migran. https://www.polrestabarelangbatam.id/2026/04/20/pengungkapan-kasus-pmi-non-prosedural-polresta-barelang-selamatkan-puluhan-calon-pekerja-migran

Kompas Regional. (2026, June 10). Batam jadi jalur utama PMI nonprosedural, ribuan orang berakhir dideportasi. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2026/06/10/181656078/batam-jadi-jalur-utama-pmi-nonprosedural-ribuan-orang-berakhir-dideportasi

Soerya Respationo. (2024). The Mayor of Batam Ex-Officio as Head of the Batam Concession Agency: Cross-Jurisdictional Authority and Legal Problems. Jurnal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 23(1).

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Tomi Farta Wijaya, Erniyanti, Soerya Respationo, Ramlan, & Siti Nurkhotijah. (2026). LEGAL ANALYSIS OF IMMIGRATION MEASURES FOR FALSE INFORMATION AT CITRA TRITUNAS PORT. Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy, 4(4), 2430–2440. Retrieved from https://jishup.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/442

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.