RECONSTRUCTING THE CONCEPT OF SUMMARY PROOF WITHIN THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURES

Authors

  • Kresna Ramadhan Wijaya Universitas Brawijaya
  • Rachmi Sulistyarini Universitas Brawijaya
  • M. Natsir Asnawi Universitas Brawijaya

Keywords:

Small Claims Court, Summary Proof, Substantive Justice

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal reasoning (ratio legis) behind the qualification of "simple" in the current Small Claims Court regulation and formulates a reconstruction of that meaning. Currently, Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 4 of 2019 defines "simple" based on quantitative-administrative limits, such as a maximum claim value of IDR 500 million and domicile constraints. This normative legal research uses statute, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. The results indicate that the current paradigm is pragmatic-economic, aimed at judicial efficiency and Ease of Doing Business (EoDB) rankings, but often neglects substantive justice. This study proposes a reconstruction by shifting the paradigm from Quantitative Simplicity to Evidentiary Simplicity. Under this new framework, a case is categorized as "simple" based on its evidentiary characteristics (clear-cut case/liquid debt) rather than its nominal value, ensuring broader access to justice for cases with high economic value but low evidentiary complexity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asnawi, M. Natsir. Hukum Acara Perdata Teori, Praktik, dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Jakarta: UII Press, 2020.

Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, dan Relevansi.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 323–338.

Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Edited by Jonathan Bennett, 2017.

Fakultas Syariah IAIN Manado. Modul Praktikum Peradilan Agama. Accessed April 26, 2026. https://fasya.iain-manado.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Modul-PPL-Peradilan.pdf.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.

Indonesia. Mahkamah Agung. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana (Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Small Claims Court Settlement).

Indonesia. Mahkamah Agung. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana (Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2019 concerning the Amendment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Small Claims Court Settlement).

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power).

Kartikawati, Dwi Ratna. Hukum Perjanjian dan Wanprestasi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2013.

Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. The Floating Press, 2009.

Miru, Ahmadi, and Sakka Pati. Hukum Perikatan Penjelasan Makna 1233 sampai 1456 BW. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.

Posner, Richard. Economic Analysis of Law. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2014.

Pratama, Putra Raditya. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Melalui Gugatan Sederhana Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 4 Tahun 2019 di Pengadilan Negeri Takengon.” Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Medan Area, 2020.

Pratama, Ridwan. “Studi Komparasi Antara Gugatan Sederhana/Small Claim Court dan Gugatan Biasa.” Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Lampung, 2023.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.

Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. “Presiden Ingin Peringkat Kemudahan Berusaha Indonesia Naik ke Posisi 40.” Accessed April 22, 2026. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/presiden_ingin_peringkat_kemudahan_berusaha_indonesia_naik_ke_posisi_40.

Semarang District Court. Decision Number 23/Pdt.G/2024/PN Smg. August 1, 2024.

Setyawan, Vincentius Patria. “Hukum yang Membebaskan: Sintesis Hukum Progresif dan Humanisme Yuridis.” Legal ADVICE 3, no. 1 (2021): 43–54.

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.

Subroto, Wandi, et al. “Dinamika Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia: Antara Keadilan Substantif dan Formalitas Prosedural.” Jurnal Abdimas Peradaban: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 5, no. 1 (2024): 81–92.

Supriyanto, Eko. “Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana Terhadap Objek Yang Dilekatkan Hak Tanggungan Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Mungkid Berdasarkan Perma Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Atas Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana.” Master’s thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2020.

Syarifuddin, Muhammad. Evolusi Modernisasi Peradilan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Imaji, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-10

How to Cite

Kresna Ramadhan Wijaya, Rachmi Sulistyarini, & M. Natsir Asnawi. (2026). RECONSTRUCTING THE CONCEPT OF SUMMARY PROOF WITHIN THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURES. Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy, 4(3), 1373–1381. Retrieved from https://jishup.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/310

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.